Conservation Issues
K I T C H E N E R – W A T E R L O O F I E L D N A T U R A L I S T S
To Ms. Paula Sawicki and Mr. Don Drackley,
Re:
Thank you for inviting the participation of the Kitchener-Waterloo Field Naturalists in the January 19, 2005, public consultation, and asking for our comments. Your “comment sheet” is used as the format for our comments below.
Any other Criteria to consider
when analyzing the alternatives?
Consideration should be given to how each alternative fits in with, or conflicts with, the (evolving) Waterloo Region Greenlands Strategy.
Top 3 Criteria:
Although all criteria listed on page 9 have importance and should be included as relevant to the evaluation process, we think that the “Natural Area Impact” is most important.
Furthermore, to 3.1 Natural Area Impact / Description / Adverse impact type: 1) localized/reversible, or 2) widespread, we would add, “3) must not conflict with Regional Greenlands Strategy.” An effective transportation plan should not compromise areas of natural heritage or the integrity of the Greenlands Strategy. Negative environmental effects considered “localized” or “reversible” should not be allowed, even temporarily.
Second in importance is 3.2 Groundwater Impact. But since groundwater quality is affected by surface water, and surface water quality is affected by air quality, and air quality is affected by resource consumption, and resource consumption is affected by modes of transportation used, traffic flow, and also industrial activity, etc., etc…. the issue of groundwater is very complex and should not be considered in isolation.
Third in importance are 1.1, 1.6, and 4.1 combined. Money spent now should utilize and adapt existing roadways and various modes of transportation, to improve roadway performance, and to adequately meet future travel needs.
Alternatives:
Alternative #4 seems to offer the best likelihood of a successful solution. However, several non-specific factors such as “minimal impact on ESPA 27”, “minimum geometric design conditions”, “mixed employment”, and “higher density” need to be more fully explained and understood, before we would offer our unconditional support.
General Comments:
We are pleased to note that walking, cycling, and public transportation are being presented as part of the solution to traffic congestion problems.
Hidden Valley has long been
regarded by KWFN members as an area rich in natural history. Preserving this
significant natural area and the wildlife it supports is important to us.
Environmental awareness, thinking, and planning have come a long way since the
“old plan” to extend
If a new road connecting
There are alternatives for
transportation improvements which allow for the protection, preservation, and
expansion of the PSW and ESPA 27 as well as providing opportunities for
rehabilitating former natural corridors
which could reconnect
We urge you to work towards a
solution which will best preserve the natural heritage of
Sincerely,
David Hunsberger, Conservation Director, Kitchener-Waterloo Field Naturalists
Legislation for Pesticide Reduction
Safeguard Species At Risk, Canadians Urge Chretien
Legislation for Pesticide Reduction
For
a Canadian charitable tax receipt, mail cheques to:
Rincon Rainforest Fund/Tropical Conservancy, 94 Four Seasons
Drive,
Webmaster: Neil
E. Taylor
Copyright © 1998 Kitchener
All rights reserved.